Focus and Scope

Manuscripts from social sciences fields of fields:

Accounting Art & Design

Business Communication

Economics Education



Humanity Information Management

Islamic Studies







Religious studies

Sustainable Development

Other Social Science Topics


Peer Review Process

The goal of peer review is to assess the quality of articles submitted for publication in a scholarly journal by experts in a specific field of research. Before an article is deemed appropriate for publication in a peer‐reviewed journal, it must undergo an evaluation process.  

1. The author of the article must submit it to the journal editor who forwards the article to experts in the field, after it has been processed through the relevant journal submission system. Because the reviewers specialize in the same scholarly area as the author, they are considered the author’s peers (hence “peer‐review”).

2.These impartial reviewers are charged with carefully evaluating the quality of the submitted manuscript, often using their own evaluation criteria to assist the review process.  

3. The peer reviewers check a number of issues in the manuscript including assessing the validity of the research methodology and procedures. They would also be vigilant for any unethical practice in the research or plagiarism.

4. If appropriate, they may recommend revisions and re‐submission of an article. In other cases they may recommend rejection for various reasons. The editor of a journal is reliant on its reviewers to offer guidance on whether to accept or reject an article.  

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Publication Ethics Statement


The statement of ethics for Jurnal Intelek Universiti Teknologi MARA Perlis Branch. This statement was adapted from the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) covering the code of ethics for the chief editor, editorial board members, reviewers and authors.



  • To be responsible of ensuring only new and original work is submitted. If the authors have used the work and/or words of others, this must be appropriately cited or quoted

  • To ensure the work produced has not been previously published in other journals.

  • To ensure submitted articles are not being reviewed or considered by other journals simultaneously. The articles are only allowed to publish after receiving a formal rejection from the journal or if withdrawal request is officially accepted by the journal.

  • To inform the Chief Editor or the publisher of any inaccuracy of data in their published work so that correction or retraction of article can be done.

  • To make significant contributions and be held accountable for any shortcoming in their work.

  • To do corrections and improvement as commented by reviewers/editor and submit  Copyright Transfer Agreement (as attached).


  • To  disclose any competing interest before agreeing to review a submission.

  • To refuse to review any submission due to a conflict of interest or inadequate knowledge.

  • To review all submissions objectively, fairly and professionally.

  • To reveal any ethical misconduct encountered while reviewing to the Chief Editor for further action.

  • To ensure the originality of a submission and be alert to any plagiarism and redundant publication.

  • To obtain permission from the publisher before disclosing the content of the submission.

  • To adhere to the time allocated for the review process and request for extension to review the submission from the Chief Editor.


  • To assist the Chief Editor in the selection process of manuscript to be published in SRJ;

  • To evaluate the contents and language of the potential manuscript that have been selected by the Chief Editor;

  • To provide recommendation in terms of  quality and suitability of the manuscript in accordance with scope of SRJ;

  • To re-evaluate the manuscript that have been corrected by the author/(s);

  • To give suggestion of improvement for the Chief Editor to make decision of selection;

  • To give feedback on the quality of the manuscript within the any given time;

  • To assist in  maintaining the highest standards of quality of the manuscript published with high ethics and competence;

  • To recommend  manuscript of originality,  quality with highest standards;

  • To assist  to call and obtain manuscripts from colleagues, acquaintance, research scholars, and students etc. within  or outside of the members institution; and

  • To promote SRJ at appropriate platforms such as Conference of National and International Importance, Seminars, Symposium and Workshops.


  • To evaluate manuscripts fairly and solely on their intellectual merit.

  • To ensure confidentiality of manuscripts and not disclose any information regarding manuscripts to anyone other than the people involved in the publishing process.

  • To be responsible to decide when and which articles are to be published.

  • To actively seek the views of board members, reviewers and authors on how to improve/ increase the image and visibility of the journal.

  • To give clear instructions to potential contributors on the submission process and what is expected of the authors.

  • To ensure appropriate reviewers are selected/ identified for the reviewing process.

  • To ensure authors should submit only original work that is not plagiarized, and has not been published or being considered elsewhere. Appropriate softwares may be used by the editorial office to check for similarities of submitted manuscripts with existing literature. Inclusion of fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements are unacceptable.

  • To ensure work and/or words from other publications must be appropriately cited or quoted.


Bahagian Penyelidikan, Jaringan Industri, Masyarakat & Alumni (Research, Industry, Community & Alumni Network)